Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘white’ Category

Race baiting and fear mongering via Daily KOS’ southern fried lack of class.

“The GOP, should I be the nominee, can say whatever they want to say about me, my track record,” Obama said. “If they think that they’re going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful because that I find unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or my family.”

Obama said his wife “loves this country. For them to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her is, I think, just low class. I think that most of the American people would think that as well.”

“Whoever is in charge of the Tennessee GOP needs to think long and hard about the kind of campaign they want to run, and I think that’s true for everybody, Democrat or Republican,” Obama said in the ABC interview, adding: “These folks should lay off my wife.”

What a wussy!

Show the Tenn GOP (and the entire world) what stuff you are made of BHO. Namby pamby weak whiner. Puke!
Ok so he defended his wifey poo. His sidekick on the campaign trail. Stumping and keeping it real.
Sooooo…..is there a Obama virtual ass whooping in Citizen One’s future?
Will Michelle Obama give him a tongue lashing?

Will he enjoy it?

What about Robert “white nigger” Byrd? Surely he has some commentary he would like to add. A pithy comment or two.

“The ex-Klansman, you see, is a Democrat. Democrats can join hate groups and utter the ugliest racial slurs and get away with it because they are Democrats. They belong to the party of racial tolerance and understanding. They’re paragons of virtue, and the rest of us are bigoted rubes.”

“Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

–Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.)

Didn’t this jackass just publicly back Obama?

True dat.

Comic Jay Leno, during the monologue for his late night show Monday, broached the Byrd endorsement. “That’s got to make Hillary feel good, huh? Even the Klan guy is going, ‘I’m going with the black guy.'”

LMFAO!

Of course as Obama is only half black. Maybe Byrd is only endorsing his white half….

Just sayin’.

Didn’t Obama at one time beg MoveOn.org members to give Byrd a helping hand?
Yep.

Isn’t reverse racism a tool used against Black’s who don’t lean left?

Mos def.

Meanwhile, for advocating a color-blind approach to justice, Clarence Thomas is often called an “Uncle Tom.” Colin Powell is characterized as a “plantation slave” for serving in a Republican Administration.

The Republican Party, as apparently too few people know, was founded largely on the issue of opposition to slavery — and has remained true to the principle of individual liberty regardless of race to this day. Last time I checked, there weren’t any ex-Kleagles on the Republican side of the aisle.

Obama-Byrd political bedfellows. That is some crazy shit.

American’s who feel they still feel the sting of racism voting Democrat, even crazier shit.

Double Standard Ya think?

Angry “Token” Bitch “Without Color”

Denial it’s a “white thing”?

Read Full Post »

…white trash gives birth to white trash.

Teenage violence escalates at school
2 women charged with egging on 13-year-old girl’s attacker in online video

MECHANICVILLE — A middle-school girl shown on an online video beating up a 13-year-old girl — while being egged on by her mother and aunt — is the latest twist in escalating youth violence enveloping this gritty mill city of 5,000.

The March 25 video shows the older girl punching the victim’s head, pulling her hair and shouting obscenities while an adult urges her to pick up and kick the younger girl, who is balled up on the ground.

“It’s a terrible, terrible situation,” said Jo Ann Rielly, the city’s director of public safety. “We pray it doesn’t turn to guns and knives, but with kids so far out of control you never know.”

Taunting, shoving and fist fights are an almost daily problem at “The Stairs,” which at afternoon dismissal funnel hundreds of middle school and high school kids through a narrow chute from school grounds down several flights of concrete steps to Park Avenue and a playground below, police said.

A police cruiser regularly parked at the bottom of the stairs and a Saratoga County sheriff’s deputy in a patrol car at the top — the school itself lies within the town of Halfmoon — have not deterred the rowdy teens.

“We’ve had several fights on the stairs recently,” said Mechanicville Police Chief Joseph Waldron, “and it’s getting worse.”

“I wouldn’t call it a gang situation, but these kids are exhibiting that kind of behavior,” he said.

Two years ago, some high school kids calling themselves the Crazy Crackers set up a Web site that threatened to take an ax and chop up anybody who crossed them. Police arrested the ringleader — he’s now in prison — and the Web site and the group were apparently shut down.

Juvenile offenses are climbing rapidly and now make up the majority of crime in the city, Waldron said. He said girls are fighting more than boys.

At 1 a.m. Sunday, a 13-year-old girl stopped by police for being out past the city’s 10 p.m. curfew kicked an officer in the groin. The girl was charged with assaulting an officer and the case has been sent to Family Court. The cop is out on injury leave.

Police are applying for a state grant to install surveillance cameras along the stairs, and the school district plans to hire a retired law enforcement officer as a “roving monitor” in the area.

“If we don’t do anything about it, this problem is going to spread,” said Mechanicville Mayor Anthony Sylvester, who supports get-tough measures aimed at juveniles.

On Tuesday, the mayor watched the girls’ fight video, from a link in the Daily Gazette, calling it “out-of-hand and disgusting.” He blamed the adults who encouraged the attack.

Veronica Farley, 31, the mother of the 15-year-old who was the aggressor and who said the younger girl had gossiped about her, and the girl’s aunt, Tina Farley, 26, were charged with endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor.

Reached at her home Tuesday, the girl’s mother said, “It’s a bunch of crap.”

The 13-year-old girl who was attacked suffered bruises and other injuries but refused medical treatment, police said. Police did not release the names of the two girls because of their ages.

The Farley sisters are due in city court on charges stemming from the fight, which broke out at the bottom of The Stairs just after the 2:20 p.m. school dismissal, police said.

By the time officers arrived, the fight was over, and nobody would cooperate with the investigation, police said.

Page 2

Mom charged after daughter involved in videotaped fight

MECHANICVILLE – A Mechanicville mother is facing child endangerment charges after a fight involving her daughter ended up online.

Police say the video involving the two teenage girls is disturbing, but even more so because they say the mother did nothing to stop the beating and even encouraged it.

Veronica Farley would say nothing to NewsChannel 13 as she walked out of her house Tuesday. It was a far cry from the outburst caught online in which the four letter expletives were flowing freely from her mouth.

The fight footage shows the Mechanicville mother is standing over her 15-year-old daughter as the teen pummels another girl. Police say she encourages the girl to keep punching away. After 20 seconds Farley finally pulls her daughter off.

“How could you not take some type of action to protect these kids and then why would you encourage this to take place?” Police Chief Joseph Waldron asked.

Police originally had their hands tied. By the time they responded to the call back in March, nearly everyone involved in the fight was gone. But they caught a break. School officials told them video of the fight was actually posted on on the Web site http://www.tinypic.com.

Police charged Farley with endangering the welfare of a child. The girl’s aunt, 26-year-old Tina Farley, who is also in the video, was also arrested.

“That video is irrefutable proof that they were there and they were encouraging it,” Waldron said.


On Tuesday, Farley’s husband defended his wife.

“The bottom line is everything she’s being accused of didn’t happen. She reacted a little bit slow to breaking up a fight. We had no idea about the video until it was too late,” her husband said.

Tuesday afternoon, someone posted on WNYT.com claiming she was Veronica Farley. The person says the fight was already going on when she got there.

“I tried to handle it the right way….I don’t have to explain myself. Bottom line, I break up a fight and I get in trouble. Where’s the justice in that,” the Internet posting said.

“They weren’t obviously parenting and therefore we’re going to parent for them. If that means arresting them and putting them in jail, that’s what we’re going to do,” Waldron said.

Endangering the welfare of a child is a misdemeanor. If convicted the two women face up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Besides increasing their presence during school dismissal, police also are applying for a grant in order to put up surveillance cameras. The chief says the reason is that they respond to fight calls at least once a week as kids are walking home from school.

“Tina Farley, 26, (the Aunt) was also charged with endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor.”
Video at link.

Hey if anyone knows where I can get my hands on some WordPress.com friendly code of the Farley fight video give me a shout.

Read Full Post »

“White guilt”. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing!

White guilt…huh…yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Uh ha haa ha
White guilt…huh…yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutley nothing…say it again y’all
White guilt..huh…look out…
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing…listen to me ohhhhh

Link

Hat tip virgomonkey

White Guilt

Frontpage Interview’s guest today Shelby Steele, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He is the author of The Content of Our Character, which won the National Book Critics Circle Award, and A Dream Deferred. He is the author of the new book White Guilt

FP: So tell us how white guilt has set back progress in civil rights.

Steele: White guilt effects everything having to do with race in America. For example, your question uses the term “civil rights” when you probably mean the progress of black people or the state of relations between the races, or whether or not racism is still a problem for blacks. White guilt has given us a euphemistic language with which to discuss race. Civil rights, as articulated in the ’64 Civil Rights Bill, are unchanged.

That said, white guilt undermines black progress and race relations because it generates disingenuous racial policies–diversity, affirmative action, and welfare without expectations (until the late 90s). These policies enable whites to fend off the racist stigma they live with but rob blacks of the incentive to work harder for their own advancement. All these “white guilt” policies ask nothing whatsoever of blacks. They are an incentive to weakness rather strength. Black high school students did worse on the SAT in 2000 than in 1990. These students know that low performance is no bar to the racial preferences of affirmative action. So why work harder? Yet American institutions almost fanatically support “white guilt” policies because the legitimacy of these institutions now depends on their proving themselves free of racism. White guilt means that America’s racial reforms serve the innocent whites while facilitating weakness in minorities.

FP: What are some destructive things about affirmative action?

Steele: Affirmative action stigmatizes minorities as second rate. How could it do otherwise when its operating mechanism is the lowering of standards for minorities? The tragedy is that, today, no high achieving black (Clarence Thomas and Condolezza Rice come to mind) is free of this stigma. Affirmative action smears and denigrates those it claims to help by casting them as “dependents” on white goodwill: “you wouldn’t be where you are if it weren’t for affirmative action.”

As if to worsen this cruelty, it is precisely the liberal supporters of affirmative action who are the first to smear blacks with it. Unless they smear blacks by telling them they owe their positions to affirmative action, they don’t get the credit for not being racist that they are looking for. This is the torturous double bind that causes affirmative action to duplicate the racial oppression of old. Like all white guilt policies, affirmative action enables whites to once again see blacks as inferior even as they steal credit for black achievements. In these policies both white supremacy and black inferiority are once again imposed on American society.

FP: Can you illuminate some ways that white liberals are self-serving?

Steele: Today the entire civil rights leadership is devoted far more to the manipulation of white guilt than to the development of their own people. The former is so easy, the latter so hard. The tragedy is that this leadership must constantly assert the weakness of black people and the power of continuing white racism in order to win favors from guilty white America. Not very inspiring to black youth to constantly hear from their own leaders that they can’t be expected to compete with others and that racism is a relentless barrier to their advancement. Only two statements are guaranteed to make a civil rights leader truly angry: to say that racism is no longer a formidable problem for blacks in America and that blacks are now free to make of their lives what they will. White racism and black weakness are the keys to white guilt, which is the same thing as black power. Without white evil and black inferiority, today’s civil rights leaders would be as impotent as Samson without his hair.

FP: Why do white liberals reject personal responsibility?

Steele: Why do white liberals reject personal responsibility? Because the symbiosis between white guilt and black power requires that only whites be responsible for racial equality. Only by literally stealing responsibility from blacks can white liberals claim the moral authority that protects them from the racist stigma. And of course, in this moral authority is very real political power. Here is the power to stigmatize the right as racist–and thus to weaken its power by showing it to be illegitimate in a free democracy. The point is that white guilt has set the terms for political legitimacy in America. This means the left will have political power far beyond its numbers and that the right will have less power than its numbers warrant. If the left began to say that personal responsibility was the best–if not the primary–way for blacks to reach equality in America, it would lose its power, a power completely dependent on the idea that whites are responsible and that blacks are victims.

White collective responsibility is the great fount of power for contemporary liberalism. This formula for power–seizing responsibility for correcting the damage done by America’s sins–is now being applied even to the environment. Liberalism casts the environment as a victim because it then gains power by taking responsibility for it. It also gains the power to further stigmatize the right as indifferent (racist) to the environment, and to assert that the right, in its “indifference,” is an illegitimate and unworthy steward of power in America. Al Gore must assert that “we cause” global warming so that he and the political left can take responsibility for fixing it. Without this responsibility there is no moral authority, no power, and no ability to stigmatize the right. If nature caused global warming, the left has no path to power.

So personal responsibility is anathema to liberalism because it cuts off the possibility of collective responsibility. White guilt is what made collective responsibility a source of liberal power in America. And it remains a source of power regardless of who or what is cast as a victim–blacks, the environment, gays, illegal immigrants, etc.. The only thing liberals cannot abide is the idea that they are not collectively responsible. And they will scratch the earth for victims in order to avoid this prospect. […]

Hmm…

Read Full Post »

Stereotyping it’s a racist thing…

For fucks sake. As if ‘white people’ have a damn magic wand they can wave. I’ll not admit to anything I have no control over. Denial? Kiss my ass. Because I sure  as hell am not kissing yours. I have had nothing handed to me on a silver platter! Benefiting from something and creating something are two entirely different things. One is the luck of the draw. The other is a premeditated action. And I have news for you all I did not create racism. I know! Scandalous huh? I do not promote it either. Some blacks are racist as are some whites. Some of both groups are neither.

This plays right into the all whites are racist and all blacks can be as racist as they please against whites, by virtue of their birth. Guess what! I HAD No choice on the skin color I was born with. I’ll not apologize for my skin color. Sorry it aint happening. So STFU!

Keep re-opening those old wounds. Continue pouring that bitter salt on them. Waging a war against racism with racism creates an endless circle! Blacks who do so are the polar opposite of white supremacists. There are many regular folks in between, making up the majority. Thank God! I resent being labeled as a racist on the mere fact that I am white. Get over yourselves. You know who you are. You know the ones who label certain blacks as Uncle Toms because they do not seethe with rage and venom as you wish they would. They have made something of themselves as any successful person has. It is called intelligence and strength.

Which leads me to…

Re-traumatizing blacks to serve the Left

Keeping people on the boil makes for very powerful group politics, which is why demagogues and tyrannical regimes do it all over the world. But there is an awful cost when individuals or groups remain in turmoil over wrongs that lie in the past.

Mental trauma

When psychiatrists try to help trauma victims, sometimes years after the event, they always need to tread a careful line. On the one hand, someone who can’t let go of the past may need to reconsider those old experiences. On the other hand, by constantly dwelling on the past it is all too easy to re-traumatize people, to scratch those old wounds so that they start bleeding all over again. Ethical therapists know about the danger of re-traumatizing people. They constantly try to avoid making things worse.

Look at the contrast. What the Left has done to black people in the last fifty years is a kind of emotional abuse — a constant, obsessional reliving of the traumatic past. Fifty years after the Civil Rights Acts, Democrat politicians, professors and preachers are still intent on rubbing salt into those old, painful wounds. It has now become institutionalized. Reliving the past is a major reason for Black Studies Departments all over the country, just as Women’s Studies are designed to perpetuate an everlasting cry of pain and rage about the fate of women throughout history. Those constant rehearsals of reasons for rage and resentment do not to help people; they just exploit their pain for political gain. As a result, the Left still gets the black vote more than 90% of the time, in exchange for fuzzy promises like “hope” and “change;” or worse, for welfare programs that undermine rather than strengthen black families and individuals.

It always works on at least some people when you rile up resentments That is why there was an NAACP TV commercial exploiting a dreadful hate crime in Texas to smear George W. Bush. It is why ethnic groups in the Balkans never stop hating each other. It is how the Rwanda genocide happened among Tutsis and Hutus. Around the world, demagogues exploit old grievances because they don’t want them to be solved. That is why the Palestinian mess cannot be solved; it has turned into an billion dollar boondoggle for the elites. There’s always a lot of money to be made off the poverty and resentment of large groups.

Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Rev Wright, etc. etc. ad nauseum Come instantly to mind.

Do they want racism to end? Hell no! What would they do with their selves then? Their pulpits and soap boxes would crumble into dust. They feed off of misery. They propagate racism, racism from which they reap their bounty. Get a clue! No one should rule their lives on raw emotion alone.

Are present day democratic voters even aware of the racist past of the democratic party in comparison to the republican party?

The National Black Republican Association Exposes Obama’s Blind Spots

Excerpts

…Obama, in his Philadelphia speech, loudly denounced the deplorable conditions in black communities. Yet, he said not one word about the fact that those communities have been run by Democrats for the past 40 years. The socialist policies of the Democrats have fostered a culture of dependency on government handouts and turned those communities into economic and social wastelands. Obama also rails against the failure to educate black children. However, he gives a pass to teachers’ union special interest groups that are responsible for black children not being educated. Those groups are aligned with the Democratic Party and are against school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black parents get their children out of failing schools. Liberal teachers act against the best interest of black children because they want to keep control of the buildings, and thus the money, but the money belongs to the people, not the buildings…

While hiding the racist past of the Democratic Party, Obama refuses to give credit to the Republican Party that:

(1) started in 1854 as the anti-slavery party and fought to free blacks from slavery;

(2) amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote;

(3) started the NAACP to stop the Democrats from lynching blacks;

(4) passed the civil rights laws of the 1860’s that were overturned by the Democrats when they took over Congress in 1892;

(5) founded the HBCUs;

(6) started affirmative action enforcement in 1969 to help blacks get jobs and contracts based on merit; and

(7) fought the Democrats for over six decades until Republicans finally achieved passage of the civil rights laws of the 1950’s and 1960’s under the leadership of Republican Senator Everett Dirksen of Illinois.

Obama, following in the footsteps of his white ancestors, is also part of the Democratic Party that:

(1) fought to keep blacks in slavery;

(2) started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize Republicans—black and white;

(3) passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws;

(4) fought every piece of civil rights legislation from the 1860’s to the 1960’s; and

(5) attacked Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and other civil rights protesters with skin-burning fire hoses and vicious dogs.

There is plenty more where that came from.

Read Full Post »